Nanomics

Your Agent Guided Physical Reality Sentry™ Tour

Physical Reality Sentry is a risk mitigation and regulatory compliance platform. At its core is our patented Distributed Thermodynamic Security layer that sits completely outside the plane of attack.

PRSentry runs a continuous pulsed status check on all enrolled assets at approximately 30-second epochs. Each pulse and the assets enrolled must first pass a rigorous certification process and, if approved, are then fused into a Merkle tree and recorded to a chained distributed immutable ledger. This ledger provides access for third party audit.

Our singular focus is to provide your full graph a continuous decentralized pulsed attestation layer that snaps onto your SOC with a thin client and zero rip and tear. Our architecture achieves this goal by addressing the centralized gaps causing ticket fatigue, increasing hunt, dwell and blast radius while hardening your SOC for an autonomous agentic ecosystem and supporting your regulatory compliance process.

The Centralized Problem

Security that cannot prove itself becomes another blind trust anchor.

These are the Three Centralized Problems.

The Runtime Gap

Code signing covers deployment, not runtime. Attackers modify binaries and configs after release — often silently, until incident response.

What shipped in an update is not automatically what is running right now.

The Circular Trust Problem

Every security tool requires trust in the security tool. Operators inherit circular assurance instead of verifiable ground truth.

The AI Verification Gap

When your AI agent decides, there is no continuous proof it was authorized, unmodified, and acting within declared bounds.

The Decentralized Solution

Three pulses. One cryptographic cadence. Public receipts when you choose to publish.

Hardware Reality Pulse™

Two jobs: room entropy from sensors outside the computer, and each hardware asset as a location node on the premise map. Move it without re-binding and the link breaks.

Software Reality Pulse™

Runtime integrity versus enrolled baselines — binaries and configuration drift surfaced in seconds.

AI Reality Pulse™

Agent authorization, model posture, and behavioral envelopes — attested alongside hardware and software.

Outside both planes

Physical Reality Sentry

Room sensors Accept server Chained ledger

Compute plane

AI agents on the machines
Applications, data, network path
Operating system and virtual hostThin sampler · No accept
Room, rack, firmware, plant

Control plane

Alert system, cases, backupsSigned check lands here
Software pipeline and inventory
Consoles, firewalls, cloud APIs
Login, admin rights, keys

The Centralized Problem

Security that cannot prove itself becomes another blind trust anchor.

The Runtime Gap

Code signing covers deployment, not runtime. Attackers modify binaries and configs after release — often silently, until incident response.

What shipped in an update is not automatically what is running right now.

The Circular Trust Problem

Every security tool requires trust in the security tool. Operators inherit circular assurance instead of verifiable ground truth.

The AI Verification Gap

When your AI agent decides, there is no continuous proof it was authorized, unmodified, and acting within declared bounds.

Thompson, 1984

No amount of source-level verification or scrutiny will protect you from using untrusted code. The lesson generalizes past compilers. Any verification chain that terminates inside the compute plane can be captured by an adversary who holds a lower layer of that plane.

Why the thin client is not the grader

The client is thin. About every thirty seconds it samples the enrolled sensors, computes hashes over the evidence and over its own files, and signs the epoch with the enrolled Ed25519 key and with an ML-DSA-87 signature over the same bytes. The record is accepted only when both signatures verify. The record path agrees a connection secret with ML-KEM-1024 and X25519, and both halves must succeed. It does not run the statistical model. There is no Bayesian scoring on premise. This keeps the accept decision off the monitored host.

The physical and statistical class bits are set here, on the server. The client does not pre-grade the room and does not decide whether the environment is genuine.

The sensors sit outside the compute plane and outside the enrolled graph of the attested location. Nothing running on the monitored host feeds them.

NanŌmics

This is what NanŌmics is built to be outside the plane of attack as a pulsed continuous spatial, temporal and scope heartbeat for all assets written to a chained immutable ledger.

Your name

Name on this screen

Is it ok if we call you

In this tour

  • Stack Enrollment
  • Sensor configuration
  • Pass, fail, or degrade
  • Tamper notice
  • How hard to fake — stack number, then five-class AND
  • PoPTriage
  • SOC integration Out and In
  • Reality Pulse Meter
  • Fleet. Lit status on each row. Epoch 41. Devnet. No receipt on this page. Click any row to open the fleet map.
  • Next Steps — Resources and request access

How to move

  • Click a heading to open that part.
  • Press Play to run the voice.
  • Press Pause to hold it.
  • Click any row in the dashboard to open the fleet map.

This page reads the asset listing. It does not write back to that listing.

AssetRoomKindSource

Before anything is enrolled

  • Thin client runs on this computer
  • Accept decision stays on the NanŌmics server — not on this host
  • Reads room sensors outside this computer — visual · acoustic · kinetic as separate feeds
  • Will hash its own program file
  • Will save three enrollment records

Guide

Scope

Guide this enrollment, read the sensor, hash the program, and show the result.

Enrolled ID

Public key, on this computer

Pass, fail, or degrade

Enroll first. When the server returns verdict=accepted, the pulse is on the record. I repeat this about every 30 seconds.

Tamper notice

Tamper notice. The hash no longer matches. The witness stops posting green results until it is fixed.

How hard to fake

Part I — the room stack (Internal estimate)

Each enrolled room runs a Bayesian check on the room reading. Pulses that pass are fused into a Merkle tree for that window. Across many independent rooms, the joint chance of faking the room check multiplies down.

≈ 9.6 × 10⁻⁸⁴ at 1,000 independently certified rooms. Internal estimate — arithmetic under independence — not a measured 1,000-room fleet. About 276 bits of work.

Three pictures of that scale

  • Lottery: winning a big jackpot once is almost impossible. Winning it about 10⁷⁵ times in a row is in the same ballpark as faking all 1,000 rooms under that estimate.
  • Atoms: pick one specific atom out of every atom in the observable universe, then still be off by about another thousand.
  • Bank crypto: AES-256 is about 2²⁵⁶ guesses. This stacked bound is about a million times harder (~2²⁷⁶).

And that is the easy part.

Part II — the five-class conjunction

On the same signed pulse, five doors must all open together:

  • Physical — the environment signal is genuine
  • Cryptographic — enrolled signatures verify
  • Logistical — the witness is where it was enrolled
  • Statistical — the reading matches the enrolled baseline
  • Temporal — the pulse is fresh and unused

Miss any one class on any one leaf and that leaf is not certified. To fake the whole epoch, an attacker would have to be present in 1,000 enrolled rooms in the same 30 seconds, with the enrolled keys, passing all five classes on every leaf, fused under one root. Short of that presence, he must break the measurement itself at those rooms, at that moment. We publish a number for the room-stack product. We do not publish a probability for that extra margin. The only known way to produce a genuine leaf is to be there.

Open the 3D model full page — 1,000 rooms, one root, and the bits comparison with post-quantum cryptography.

PoPTriage

PoPTriage time-joins inbound alerts to accepted epochs on the enrolled graph, assigns triage priority classes (for example tamper · halt · pulse failure · accepted · unenrolled), and emits enrichment that includes pulse evidence and spatial context (zone · room · deployment) when enrolled.

SOC integration Out and In

Out: signed accepted epochs · tamper / halt notices · audit export.

In: security alert records from SIEM / SOAR.

Reality Pulse Meter

Reality Pulse Meter counts one billable event per accepted epoch — an epoch the NanŌmics server returned as verdict=accepted on the enrolled stack.

Hardware Reality Pulse

Two jobs

Room entropy from sensors outside this computer · each HW asset = location node on the premise map

Feeds

Visual · acoustic · kinetic (separate). A camera does not fill sound or motion.

Room digest

Saved. Raw picture and sound are not stored.

Win line

enroll first · verdict=accepted

Program

File

The program that is running

Hash

Saved on this computer

Enrolled ID

Public key, on this computer

This room

Guide

Assistant, with the scope just typed

Enrolled ID

Public key

Sensor

Room sensors outside host (V · A · K)

Enrolled ID

Public key

Program

Hash of the file that is running

Enrolled ID

Public key

Capability manifest

Signer

NanŌmics

Status

Review

Tied to

The program hash

  • These files
  • This sensor
  • These calls

Click any row to open the fleet map for that asset. Lights match the live site. The epoch row lights only when a Solana receipt for that root is on the page.

Sentry epoch 41

Merkle root desk-root-41

Solana Devnet No receipt on this page. This epoch row stays dark.

EpochRootSolana receipt
41desk-root-41No receipt · devnet
EnrollmentHardwareSoftwareAI pulseLast heartbeatStatusRoomRack

Next Steps

This guided tour ends here.

If you would like a deeper dive, click on our Resources page.

If you are an investor, a potential OEM founding partner, or SOC leadership, please click here to fill out the form for access to your respective documents and demos.

Your room

Digest only

Guide · Sensor · Program

This pulse

The result shows here.

On this computer